| Rethinking the Ways We Forecast |
|
| Thursday, 11 June 2009 | ||||||
|
David Orrell and Patrick McSharry explain why we've seen huge breakdowns in our models when we try to forecast complex systems, such as the economy, the weather, and our genetic network, in a feature section in the upcoming Summer 2009 issue of Foresight. Needed, they argue, are 1) new methodologies that explicitly address key features of complex systems, and 2) a shift of emphasis away from single-point forecasts and toward scenarios of possible futures. Commentaries from Roy Batchelor and from Paul Goodwin and Robert Fildes punch back, saying, in so many words, “Not so fast -- the new tools haven’t proven themselves and may complexify without improving our forecasts.” It’s heady stuff, but gives us a glimpse into the future of forecasting. Also in this issue of Foresight:
Foresight, an official publication of the International Institute of Forecasters, seeks to advance the practice of forecasting by publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles, written in a concise, accessible style for forecasting analysts, managers, and students. For more information about Foresight, go to www.forecasters.org/foresight Write Comment
Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6 |
||||||














